Federal Rules of Evidence 2015-2016 Statutory and Case Supplement to Fisher's Evidence, 3rd (University Casebook Series)
$ 266
Availability: Currently in Stock
Delivery: 10-20 working days
Condition: USED (All books are in used condition)
Condition - Very Good The item shows wear from consistent use, but it remains in good condition and functions properly. Item may arrive with damaged packaging or be repackaged. It may be marked, have identifying markings on it, or have minor cosmetic damage. It may also be missing some parts/accessories or bundled items.
Federal Rules of Evidence 2015-2016 Statutory and Case Supplement to Fisher's Evidence, 3rd (University Casebook Series)
This statutory and case supplement incorporates the latest statutory changes and proposed revisions and the most recent U.S. Supreme Court decisions bearing on evidence law.
The statutory component of this volume reflects the new amendments to Federal Rules of Evidence 801(d)(1)(B), 803(6)(E), 803(7)(C), and 803(8)(B), all of which took effect on December 1, 2014. Also included are proposals to delete Rule 803(16) and to add two new authentication rules, 902(13) and 902(14). The Advisory Committee’s Notes to all these changes and proposals, together with explanatory editor’s notes, appear as well.
The statutory component also includes a side-by-side reprinting of the older (pre-2011), unrestyled Federal Rules of Evidence and the newly restyled rules to allow for ready comparison. Editor’s notes point out those areas where the restyling project, contrary to its authors’ claimed intentions, worked substantive changes in the rules.
The case supplement analyzes the Supreme Court’s very recent decision in Ohio v. Clark as well as its 2014 ruling in Warger v. Shauers and 2013 ruling in Salinas v. Texas. Clark addresses whether the admission against the defendant of a young child’s allegation of abuse, made out of court and offered in lieu of the child’s testimony at trial, violated the defendant’s confrontation right. Warger raises questions concerning the application of Rule 606(b). And Salinas examines the prosecution’s use in its case-in-chief of a suspect’s silence in response to noncustodial police questioning.
Those who teach with Fisher’s Evidence (3d ed. 2013) will benefit from paginated cross-references between the casebook and this supplement.
![Regulation of Lawyers: Problems of Law and Ethics [Connected Casebook] (Aspen Casebook)](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/41Mu1-MMlgL._SL160_.jpg)
